<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ben Jao Ming &#187; greenmyapple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overtag.dk/wordpress/category/debate/greenmyapple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overtag.dk/wordpress</link>
	<description>101% objective... always</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 13:16:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Green My Apple was a success</title>
		<link>http://overtag.dk/wordpress/2007/05/green-my-apple-was-a-success/</link>
		<comments>http://overtag.dk/wordpress/2007/05/green-my-apple-was-a-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 09:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>benjamin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenmyapple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overtag.dk/wordpress/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of criticism has rained upon this campaign. Especially on the net on sites like digg.com and in the Mac community. People simply saw Apple as &#8220;green already&#8221; and thought of Greenpeace as attention-grabbers. Now that Steve Jobs has &#8230; <a href="http://overtag.dk/wordpress/2007/05/green-my-apple-was-a-success/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://overtag.dk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/promoagreenerapple20070502.jpg" alt="promoagreenerapple20070502.jpg" style="margin-left: 10px" align="right" /> A lot of criticism has rained upon this campaign. Especially on the net on sites like digg.com and in the Mac community. People simply saw Apple as &#8220;green already&#8221; and thought of Greenpeace as attention-grabbers. Now that Steve Jobs has written that they&#8217;re disclosing their policy people are even more after Greenpeace in this second-guessing way going &#8220;see, Apple was green from the beginning&#8221;. So there&#8217;s actually a bunch of people who has more trust in Apple than Greenpeace. That seems like a pretty wrong bias, and I think the writings of Steve Jobs clearly prove that he has payed attention to the campaign. The green Apple on apple.com, the headline &#8220;A Greener Apple&#8221; and then the actual sentences:</p>
<blockquote><p>Apple is already a leader in innovation and engineering, and we are applying these same talents to become an environmental leader.</p></blockquote>
<p>See, that was exactly what GP wanted them to say <strong>in public</strong>. And now Greenpeace applauds this and gives thanks to all the people &#8211; Greenpeace isn&#8217;t taking the credit for this, they&#8217;re giving it to Apple and the Apple fans who used the campaign to tell Apple how much they&#8217;d like to see them as an environmental leader.</p>
<p>I sincerely hope that this will be a new beginning where Apple can set a good example and Greenpeace can cheer the other electronics companies to follow this example. We need everybody to follow troop:</p>
<ul>
<li>Using the precautionary principle to substitute everything that&#8217;s potentially dangerous</li>
<li>Taking back all used products globally</li>
<li>Designing products that last longer</li>
<li>Making reuse and upgrade of products much more simple</li>
</ul>
<p>We have limited natural resources and a very dirty business exporting toxic electronics waste to poor countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overtag.dk/wordpress/2007/05/green-my-apple-was-a-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avoiding prejudice</title>
		<link>http://overtag.dk/wordpress/2007/02/avoiding-prejudice/</link>
		<comments>http://overtag.dk/wordpress/2007/02/avoiding-prejudice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>benjamin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenmyapple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overtag.dk/wordpress/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greenpeace is a kind of b/w thing for many people. They either dig it or they don&#8217;t. I just started working there. First task was to translate Green My Apple into Danish. That went down pretty well, I think. Now, &#8230; <a href="http://overtag.dk/wordpress/2007/02/avoiding-prejudice/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://overtag.dk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/dk-apple-comp.gif" alt="Green My Apple" align="right" style="margin: 5px" />Greenpeace is a kind of b/w thing for many people. They either dig it or they don&#8217;t. I just started working there. First task was to translate <a href="http://www.greenmyapple.org/dk">Green My Apple into Danish</a>. That went down pretty well, I think. Now, this campaign probably triggers something quite common amongst the Greenpeace haters out there. Why bash Apple? Isn&#8217;t that just some media humping stunt as usual. Apple can&#8217;t possibly be the worst environmental issue &#8211; far from.</p>
<p>My answer to that: Yes, Apple isn&#8217;t the biggest issue, and yes, it&#8217;s a good target because of media attention. But that&#8217;s not the purpose of the campaign, and people saying that have completely misunderstood everything. Now, the big issue is: E-waste. Now THAT&#8217;S actually a big problem. And Greenpeace wants to help solve that problem, but that&#8217;s very difficult since the producers of E-waste are so numerous. We have to start somewhere.</p>
<p>One thing that could be done about this: Innovation. We need better products free from chemicals that make them dangerous when being disposed of. Secondly we need products with a long life cycle. That means iPods capable of upgrading.</p>
<p>But another part-solution to the problem is called producer responsibility. Since it&#8217;s not being legally enforced in more than a handful of European countries, it&#8217;s up to Greenpeace to push for more legislation and voluntary producer responsibility. We need manufacturers to implement full product take-back in order to have an economic incitement for making recyclable products.</p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s part in all this? They HAVE to push forward. E-waste is a giant problem. We need action, and since other companies are actually pushing forward, we want to stimulate Apple to join the competition. So far Greenpeace has come up with <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/how-the-companies-line-up">Guide To Clean Electronics</a>. This creates some sort of economic incitement for becoming cleaner at least. But work will continue, and hopefully soon people will see the purpose of Green My Apple in more than just words of encouragement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overtag.dk/wordpress/2007/02/avoiding-prejudice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

